Jun. 29th 2009
A recent article on Ragan.com about “Why Employees Don’t Read Your Emails – and What to Do About it” was very enlightening, not for its familiar recommendations, but for the reader comments:Â
Several corporate communicators wrote in with stories about how they were blamed by Management for a lack of employee response, despite sending several quality emails out on a particular subject. Employees didn’t show up to an event or complained they were ‘never told’ about key changes, despite the efforts of Communications teams. Does this sound familiar to anyone? Have you ever found regular corporate emails had little or no impact?
Everyone is so info overloaded today that it’s getting harder and harder to cut through the noise with email
. And if you can’t get employees’ attention, good luck ever getting to the very basic stage of ‘informing’, OR to the point of changing behavior or getting some sort of action. The impact on an organization overall is huge – it takes longer for change to happen.
Here are some ideas on how to change this:Â
FIXING YOUR CONTENT
1. Set up common tags (Action, FYI, Urgent, Request) in the Subject line to cue readers. If you want a response or action, you’d better say so right off the bat.Â
2. Standard email message structure across the organization: I like this recommendation from the IABC Research Report, “Preparing Messages for Information Overload Environments”. They give examples from Proctor and Gamble and Microsoft, who have standard proposal structures (i.e. Idea, Background, How it Works, Benefits, Next Steps) which are consistent across the organization and help them improve communications effectiveness and efficiency. This idea can be adopted to email for corporate announcements. Here’s one possible structure for broadcast emails:
a. Summary (two lines explaining what the email is about)
b. Call to Action (what action the reader needs to take – learn this, complete this, attend this, etc)
c. Deadline/Timeframe (deadline for action or expiry of relevance)
d. Details (additional key details written out in the email itself)
e. Additional Information (hyperlinks to the intranet, attachments, Q&As, etc.)
CONSOLIDATION
3. Consolidate – reduce email broadcasts by setting up a daily or weekly news bulletin, and have depts and employees feed their announcements into this. This means fewer individual interruptions for staff and makes the few remaining critical/urgent announcements that do get sent separately stand out.Â
(I wish I could find some decent statistics on the number of businesses doing this – we’ve seen these kinds of bulletins become more and more prevalent, but they are still not ubiquitous, especially in medium and small enterprises.)
CHANGING THE GAME
4. Create and enforce  Broadcast Communications Guidelines. Rather than approaching each email or project separately, take a company-wide view of broadcast communications. Manage it to protect employees from too much noise and to make sure the critical 5% can be heard.
Establish (through two-way interaction, of course!) company-wide guidelines/criteria. Train all dept/managers who broadcast to use them and hold them to account.  This reduces noise, improves message quality, and ultimately helps staff be more productive by making it easier and faster for them to process and absorb key information.
Are there any people out there who’ve actually taken their company’s broadcast communications in hand? Have you done an audit, established criteria for what’s worthy of broadcasting, defined which channels are appropriate for which messages? I’d love to know how far people have gone with this.
At the IABC World Conference in San Francisco, a communicator from Johnson & Johnson mentioned that they’d done a lot of work and had internal broadcast email under control – anyone else?  Other communicators I met in Employee Comms sessions or in the halls agreed that email overload was a real problem in their company, to varying degrees.